Materials modeling of Ge-based nanostructure through metalloid/metal group 13 adsorption compared to Li in ion batteries: monitoring density of states for structural, physical and electronic properties analysis

Authors

  • Fatemeh Mollaamin Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29303/aca.v9i1.300

Keywords:

Boron group , germanium carbide , energy-saving, novel hybrid-ion batteries, density of states

Abstract

Boron group-based materials, with impressive capacity utilization and self-healing ability, provide better alternatives for alkali metal ion batteries that exhibit all-round performance with the balance of energy/power density and cycling stability. Germanium carbide (GeC) has been designed and characterized as an anode electrode for lithium (Li), boron (B), aluminum (Al) and gallium (Ga)-ion batteries due to forming X2(GeC) (X = Li, B, Al, Ga) nanoclusters. A vast study on energy-saving by X2(GeC) complexes was probed using computational approaches due to density state analysis of charge density differences (CDD), total density of states (TDOS) and molecular electrostatic potential (ESP) for hybrid clusters of X2(GeC). A small portion of Li, B, Al or Ga entered the Ge–C layer could improve the structural stability of the electrode material at high multiplicity, thereby improving the capacity retention rate. Higher Ge/C content can increase battery capacity through X2(GeC) nanoclusters for energy storage process and improve the rate performances by enhancing electrical conductivity. Besides, GeC anode material may advance cycling consistency by excluding electrode decline and augments the capacity owing to higher surface capacitive impacts. In this research article, the recent progress of boron, aluminum or gallium -based anodes and their storage mechanism is presented. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] B.I.N.G. Mingcheng, M.O. Fan, H.U. Zhengfei, Electrochemistry. 88, 525–531 (2020). doi.org/10.5796/electrochemistry.20-00064

[2] W. Xia, S. Zheng, L. Qiu, et al.,. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies (2025). doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/203046

[3] O.O. Onawumi, J.A. Olaniyan, A.O. Esan, et al., Materials International. 6, 27 (2024). doi.org/10.33263/Materials63.027

[4] L. Zhou, L. Xie, J. Dai, et al., Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, e70056 (2025). doi.org/10.1002/apj.70056

[5] X. Ma, H. Li, J. Tan, et al., Journal of Magnesium and Alloys, 13, 1592–1601 (2025). doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2024.03.010

[6] G. Shao, D.A.H. Hanaor, J.Wang, et al., ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 12, 46045–46056 (2020). doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c12376

[7] I.G. Shaikhiev, N.V. Kraysman, S.V. Sverguzova, Materials International. 7, 4 (2025). doi.org/10.33263/Materials71.004

[8] V. Ankam, G.Karka, L.G. Reddy, Materials International, 7, 1 (2025). doi.org/10.33263/Materials71.001

[9] X. Liu, X.-Y.Wu a, B.Chang, et al., Energy Storage Materials. 30, 146–169 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.05.010

[10] F. Mollaamin, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B. 19, 722–736 (2025). doi.org/10.1134/S1990793125700393

[11] F. Mollaamin, BMC Chemistry. 19, 233 (2025). doi.org/10.1186/s13065-025-01593-0

[12] F. Mollaamin, M. Monajjemi, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 18, 607–623 (2024). doi.org/10.1134/S1990793124020271

[13] L. Ma, J. Tan, Y. Wang, et al., Advanced Energy Materials, 13, 2300042 (2023). doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202300042

[14] Y. An, Y. Tian, C. Wei, et al., ACS Nano, 13, 13690–13701(2019). doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.9b06653

[15] W. Kohn, L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, 140, A1133- A1138 (1965). doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133

[16] C. Lee, W. Yang, R.G. Parr, Phys Rev B. 37, 785–789 (1988). doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785

[17] A. D. Becke & K. E. Edgecombe, J. Chem. Phys. 92, 5397–5403 (1990). doi.org/10.1063/1.458517.

[18] G. Henkelman, A. Arnaldsson, H. Jónsson, Computational Materials Science. 36, 354–360 (2006). doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010

[19] M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, X. Li, M. Caricato, A. V. Marenich, J. Bloino, B. G. Janesko, R. Gomperts, B. Mennucci, H. P. Hratchian, J. V. Ortiz, A. F. Izmaylov, J. L. Sonnenberg, D. Williams-Young, F. Ding, F. Lipparini, F. Egidi, J. Goings, B. Peng, A. Petrone, T. Henderson, D. Ranasinghe, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. Gao, N. Rega, G. Zheng, W. Liang, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T. Vreven, K. Throssell, J. A. Montgomery, Jr., J. E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro, M. J. Bearpark, J. J. Heyd, E. N. Brothers, K. N. Kudin, V. N. Staroverov, T. A. Keith, R. Kobayashi, J. Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. P. Rendell, J. C. Burant, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi, M. Cossi, J. M. Millam, M. Klene, C. Adamo, R. Cammi, J. W. Ochterski, R. L. Martin, K. Morokuma, O. Farkas, J. B. Foresman, and D. J. Fox, Gaussian 16, Revision C.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, 2016.

[20] R. Dennington, T. A. Keith, J. M. Millam, GaussView, Version 6.06.16, Semichem Inc., Shawnee Mission, KS, 2016.

[21] Z. Xu, C. Qin, Y. Yu, et al., AIP Advances. 14, 055114 (2024). doi.org/10.1063/5.0208082

[22] G Henkelman, A Arnaldsson, and H Jónsson, Computational Materials Science. 36, 354–360 (2006). doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010

[23] Z. Rukelj, I. Kupčić, D. Radić, Symmetry. 16, 38 (2024). doi.org/10.3390/sym16010038

[24] Jane S. Murray, Peter Politzer, The electrostatic potential: an overview. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 1, 153–163 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.19.

[25] T. Lu & F. Chen, J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580–592 (2012). doi.org/10.1002/jcc.22885

[26] T. Lu, J. Chem. Phys. 161, 082503 (2024). doi.org/10.1063/5.0216272

[27] C. F. Matta, P. W. Ayers, R. Cook, Lecture Notes in Chemistry, Springer, Cham, 112 (2024). doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51434-0_2.

Materials modeling of ge-based nanostructure through metalloid/metal group 13 adsorption compared to li in ion batteries: monitoring density of states for structural, physical and electronic properties analysis

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Mollaamin, F. (2026). Materials modeling of Ge-based nanostructure through metalloid/metal group 13 adsorption compared to Li in ion batteries: monitoring density of states for structural, physical and electronic properties analysis. Acta Chimica Asiana, 9(1), 795–802. https://doi.org/10.29303/aca.v9i1.300

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Fatemeh Mollaamin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with ACA: Acta Chimica Asiana agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in ACA: Acta Chimica Asiana.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

 

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.